Granted that politics is an unavoidable part of life, from which come ramifications for society as a whole, it is often interesting to hear someone’s political views brought to light, but this can often lead to bitter arguments. To steer clear of such discomfort, the CORE Insider conducted a survey of this, where anonymity was assured to all 50 respondents (except for cases in which students took the survey together). This study takes its scope as the school at large, with a look to enlighten on the general political inclinations, even if they are still forming or not yet defined. The sample was not quite randomly selected, as the surveyor approached students with whom he was already friendly, resulting in upperclassmen being overrepresented in the data. Despite this, the survey’s findings are still a useful look at the political views of CORE students.
- Would you identify yourself as tending more to the left or the right of the political center?

Sentiments on each of the following issues:
2. The recent conduct of ICE

3. The President’s desire to rid the country of illegal immigrants

4. Some form of federal protection lent to abortion

5. Taxes levied more heavily upon the wealthy

6. Alteration in general tax burthen

7. The separation of church and state

8. United State’s rôle in the Israeli-Palestinian

9. The same vis-à-vis Russo-Ukrainian War

10. The demurrence of the Justice Department against the injunction of Congress to release the Epstein Files in extenso

11. Tariffs latterly imposed

12. Impingement in the domestic affairs of Venezuela

13. Overtures, militant and pecuniary inclined, to acquire Greenland

14. Has the office of the Presidency arrogated for itself too much power over against the other branches?

15. What would you suppose ought to be the most treasured, the most jealously guarded, of the liberties and privileges granted us by the Constitution as it presently stands?

Analysis: In their rejoinders, the respondents connoted a mild yet marked tendency towards to the Left, yet attesting a contrary explicit disposition. Presupposed no arrant defiance to cogency has befallen my compatriots (though such presumption is generally abjectly perilous when appraising teenagers, I fancy our school a’chock with a devout flock of prodigious nonpareil proselytes may be granted extraordinary trusted), there appears to us two principle considerations of reconciliation.
- In the political center’s headlong occidental dash of years late, accidents of purchase are wont to bedevil those who are not, when confronting the Stygian depths bound to inspire contravertiginous terror, of a stalwart sangfroid or extraordinary Ausdauer to not invoke portage and gad gaily down to the Lethe, to thus abide diligently in apprising oneself of contemporary affairs, in other words, those of superlative qualities, but understandably, nary to be observed in any but the most nascent natures or sere junctures of seres. Ergo, the respondents may have informed their, I am sure, deliberatively introspective responses with a reasonably retroposed view of the putative political center.
- The more likely, I ween, of the probabilities, is that the survey is not suited to account for the quality of these predilections or precepts; that is, those which are galvanizingly impulsed as overriding lesser concerns: vis-à-vis conservatives, an idée fixe may be the abrogation of abortion, or so-nominated “familial values”.


































































Annika McCord • Mar 28, 2026 at 11:28 am
I think it’s very interesting to see everyones opinions all laid out and shown on a graph. I also thought it was cool to see there was some things everyone completely agreed on, that doesn’t happen often.
Aiden Anderson • Mar 26, 2026 at 3:13 pm
I think the way the questions were phrased were ore favorable towards the left instead of leaning one way or the other it should be middle. For example ” The President’s desire to rid the country of illegal immigrants”. It portrays the President as the only one who wants to rid the country of the illegal immigrants. When he is just simply enforcing the law in our country.
Clark Goodman • Apr 1, 2026 at 11:26 am
Thank you, Aiden. People fail to look at the law and immediately poke at our President. Ad Hominem and a blend of the Tu Quoque fallacy.
Sam Leonard • Apr 7, 2026 at 1:25 pm
Mr. Goodman, please see my response below in answer to your compatriots betrayed preconception. In particulate rejoinder to your concurrence, the ad hominem and tu quoque fallacies are unfortunately incorrigible and ubiquitous pests of politics, as persons, I ween, shall always be swayed by a winsome personality, in excess of concern for its practical implications. I suppose the relevantly implicit imputation aimed hereof is that this is the primary basis upon which the president’s policies are registered as unpopular in this survey; I think it a token of a puerile and sanctimonious intransigence to baldly imply that any of the respondents were decisively swayed by sophistical bromides without the slightest soupçan of evidence testifying to the fact adduced, and to souse an unctuous veneer in obfuscation of the friability of your claim as it stands by the interpolation of terms you believe shall lend you the wrought persona of an erudite and lettered cognoscente. If I might take the liberty to proffer some unsolicited council, the boorish lobbing of massy, hollow baubles of vacuous, overweening grandiloquency shall find itself congenial amongst the gaudy kuklos of the more cocksure of philosophy majors; ergo, such might well be a chief prospective of potential post-graduate modalities.
Post-Script: please do not express your gratitude for a fellow commenter matching your apparent lack of forethought, it only serves to perpetuate our bedevilment with glib, ill-begotten, ill-conceived amour propre overflowing into extraneous affairs and molesting more level-headed folks. A merry Bridge and Power Plant Day unto ye, I pray you enjoy this.
Clark Goodman • Apr 8, 2026 at 12:08 pm
Ad Hominem: Attacking the person, not the policy
Tu Quoque: Addressing hypocrisy/morality instead of the argument
Now define your terms, please.
Clark Goodman • Apr 8, 2026 at 12:10 pm
Besides the disagreement, I really enjoyed your article!
Sam Leonard • Apr 7, 2026 at 12:27 pm
I cannot conceive of how such a cast could be imputed beyond the beguiling perversion of prepossession: how could my dilation upon the President, who has emplaced himself at the conspicuous vanguard of the latter-day surge of this conservative idée fixe, but through the enigmatic inner-workings of a febrile imagination or a woefully deficient capacity to discriminate ‘twixt hoary pedantism and good-faith qualms, be converted to so peregrine a tertium quid as this traduction; to melt the cornice from the salient, if I were to note that Mr. E is fond of ice cream, is it thereby betokened that his is a lonely coterie? Moreover, if anything my query bent more to a conservative attitude, as I deliberatively chose to ascribe the adjective “illegal”, rather than “undocumented”, which is oft-preferred by New Deal liberals. I am sorry if the results of the survey induced discomfiture to your, if I may take the liberty to propound in kind to the circumspection which you appear to have exercised in the posting of the message, precociously delicate sensibilities, and pray that in the future, the issues (for unquestionably the survey was not rigorously sound, as I note throughout the article [refer to Mr. Jacobson or Mr. McComb’s respective comments for fine examples of sound and productive critique]) which are taken up in these comment sections treat somewhere in the purlieu of reality, though I cannot pretend I find the odds promissory.
Aiden Anderson • Mar 26, 2026 at 3:07 pm
I think that the ways the questions were worded were more favorable towards the left. I think the questions could be more middle neutral. For example ” the Presidents desire to rid the country of illegal immigrants” every country manages illegal immigration but this article portrays the president as the only one who is wanting to deport them. When he is just enforcing the law.
Serina Rogers • Mar 26, 2026 at 2:01 pm
I think the questions selected were very though provoking. As the author said, it’s interesting how some people would identify as one way, but then answer the questions in contradiction. Overall it gives us a better perspective of the diverse opinions and political views we have here at CORE.
Luke McComb • Mar 26, 2026 at 1:59 pm
I really enjoyed reading this and I thought the questions covered most of the hot topics of today. However, some of the questions were slightly vague and may have unintentionally swayed the person being question because of how they were phrased. For example, the question of whether “Some form of federal protection should be lent to abortion” is not really clear on what exact protection is being established. Overall though, this is a great article. I think it is important for students to be aware of these controversial issues in our world and polls like this are excellent ways to accomplish that.
Madison Henry • Mar 26, 2026 at 10:52 am
This is a super interesting article to read. I loved seeing the different perspectives people in our school have. Reading this article has made me realize just how diverse our school is and it was really helpful to see the statistics right in front of me.
Steiger Jacobsen • Mar 14, 2026 at 1:10 pm
It’s extremely hard to capture the whole grasp of these issues because they are so nuanced, so a simple agree/disagree question feels a bit misleading, It would be cool if you put it in a range from like strongly agree to strongly disagree. Even that doesn’t represent the issue fully but it definitely shows a more accurate reflection of all these complicated issues.
Sam Leonard • Mar 26, 2026 at 11:18 am
I heartily concur with your disputation as to the inability of such a survey as this to account for the innumerable flavours of positive and negative attitudes, but really this survey never pretended nor intended to be an intensive study, but only a rather superficial primer to further inquiry. Given that I polled fifty respondents, and that I had to coax quite soothingly and protractedly to secure answers whatever, it may well have taken upwards of five hours just to cohere all of the responses. Nota bene, I am not sure how I would have represented each particularized shade in a pithy and easy to understand manner; a pie-chart certainly would not have serviced. As to whether I could have reduced the number of respondents whilst increasing the depth of the probe, I put a good deal of thought as to the relative efficacy of each mode, but was decidedly wary of engaging with a diminutive sample size, coupled with ineluctable selection bias; thus I resolved to undertake a relatively sound survey discovering a bit, than one pretending to proffer much information of questionable validity.